<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About these &#8220;union bosses&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://revolutionaryact.org/2008/12/about-these-union-bosses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://revolutionaryact.org/2008/12/about-these-union-bosses/</link>
	<description>"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - George Orwell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 16:43:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uri</title>
		<link>http://revolutionaryact.org/2008/12/about-these-union-bosses/comment-page-1/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Uri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revolutionaryact.org/?p=493#comment-714</guid>
		<description>no sooner did i post this than i started having doubts about it. it was my first go at trying to articulate how union leaders differ from bosses, and now i think it&#039;s in need of a rewrite - but a little later, not now. if i had to reframe it, i would put it this way: union leaders are less boss-like than bosses, and less elected-official-like than ordinary elected executive leaders, with respect to union members, because members generally have both kinds of right against the union leaders: the rights of &quot;citizens&quot; (the leader is a servant, democratic oversight, pressure of re-election) and the rights of employees (the right to quit, statutory protections like anti-discrimination). At the same time, union leaders do not have rights that bosses have, such as the right to fire or change the terms of employment/membership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no sooner did i post this than i started having doubts about it. it was my first go at trying to articulate how union leaders differ from bosses, and now i think it&#8217;s in need of a rewrite &#8211; but a little later, not now. if i had to reframe it, i would put it this way: union leaders are less boss-like than bosses, and less elected-official-like than ordinary elected executive leaders, with respect to union members, because members generally have both kinds of right against the union leaders: the rights of &#8220;citizens&#8221; (the leader is a servant, democratic oversight, pressure of re-election) and the rights of employees (the right to quit, statutory protections like anti-discrimination). At the same time, union leaders do not have rights that bosses have, such as the right to fire or change the terms of employment/membership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

