<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Justice Lawyering as Counterculture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://revolutionaryact.org/2009/01/social-justice-lawyering-as-counterculture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://revolutionaryact.org/2009/01/social-justice-lawyering-as-counterculture/</link>
	<description>"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - George Orwell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 16:43:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Uri</title>
		<link>http://revolutionaryact.org/2009/01/social-justice-lawyering-as-counterculture/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Uri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revolutionaryact.org/?p=521#comment-797</guid>
		<description>one thing i&#039;ve learned is that &quot;legal ethics&quot; is often shorthand for &quot;the rules of the legal profession,&quot; which may be motivated by ethics, but might also be motivated by other considerations, such as creating more work for lawyers or restricting entry into the field. i see conflict of interest rules as being partially ethics-based, partly make-work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one thing i&#8217;ve learned is that &#8220;legal ethics&#8221; is often shorthand for &#8220;the rules of the legal profession,&#8221; which may be motivated by ethics, but might also be motivated by other considerations, such as creating more work for lawyers or restricting entry into the field. i see conflict of interest rules as being partially ethics-based, partly make-work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy Mullen</title>
		<link>http://revolutionaryact.org/2009/01/social-justice-lawyering-as-counterculture/comment-page-1/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy Mullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 06:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revolutionaryact.org/?p=521#comment-795</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that a lot of legal ethics stance seem to end up requiring more lawyers and more legal hours.

I remember asking a lawyer if there are law firms that would review documents for a startup on an equity contigency, the lawyer immediately replied &quot;oh that would be a conflict of interest, you&#039;d have to hire another lawyer to negotiate the retainer for you&quot;.  That is the first one that jumps to mind, but there are many others.  Somehow this felt related</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that a lot of legal ethics stance seem to end up requiring more lawyers and more legal hours.</p>
<p>I remember asking a lawyer if there are law firms that would review documents for a startup on an equity contigency, the lawyer immediately replied &#8220;oh that would be a conflict of interest, you&#8217;d have to hire another lawyer to negotiate the retainer for you&#8221;.  That is the first one that jumps to mind, but there are many others.  Somehow this felt related</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
